North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Internet2
- From: Vicky Rode
- Date: Tue Apr 26 19:51:05 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Maybe you should checkout some performance measurement numbers/papers
from ACM (www.acm.org) which should help answer some of your questions.
We are doing some interesting measurement research (qos related) and
unfortunately I don't have any data to share.
Then again, I'm not saying that Internet is going to crash and burn, its
doomed and that one should switch to I2. All I'm asking is for some
insight about potential risk of I2 abuse, that's all.
Not that this link answers your question, since you asked hopefully this
~ will keep you busy for few hours.
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/comp/net/wan-mon/netmon.html
regards,
/vicky
Randy Bush wrote:
|>Basically I meant to say not congested as the current Internet is.
|
|
| cool. and your measurements of internet congestion are? cites, please.
|
| randy
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCbtOZpbZvCIJx1bcRAkWTAKDgkf+gKJ4klHh/aVKJ9gh+9wQ58wCgvVG8
RBNfdo1cb3WdpZyUwBWauD8=
=I8AO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
