North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND
- From: Paul Vixie
- Date: Mon Apr 11 17:39:35 2005
if we still had moderation, i feel sure that i'd've been kicked off the
list by now for my attention to needless detail in this hairy thread.
"hit D now"
> So, I guess I'm wondering.... how is what BIND9 does substantially
> different than the case I've outlined above?
the modem vendors you were referring to believed that they were extending
the existing mo/dem specification. authors of BIND9 and tinydns each believe
that they are implementing what's written in RFC 1035. so, different.
--
Paul Vixie
|
