North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP Evaluation
- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Date: Tue Mar 29 22:19:55 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=CUeZCbltGPW8qHR2aPRUL+zpl8OjjP1XWfkE+D8ELKw2DQOdmArXU/hGNmcMVJ1u2njHI/dWx8u9qR35QLnPn7QKNe/KuK4kQRJCpi9mi65zRcM80ku+vnU3a8F+Jd6AF/E0jSZqUg7LaYfMQVpRlHETvBscleriULsiInhpGvI=
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:24:52 -0500, Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland
Maine <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> A summary of the report and a link to the full report can be found at:
> So now you know. VGRS, NS+, AF, ranked 1, 2, 3; DE and CORE ranked 4 & 5.
I do believe that study is open to peer review?
Telcordia ranking VRSN way ahead does seem to be raising some hackles here
Suresh Ramasubramanian (email@example.com)