North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
- From: Micah McNelly
- Date: Tue Mar 15 13:54:30 2005
Actually I got a response quickly from a list member who represent sorbs
at some level. Do you really think opinion has a place in mail
delivery? What if the USPS decided any magazine you subscribed to was
suddenly unfit for delivery and decided it should blocked (thrown away)?
Robert Bonomi wrote:
From firstname.lastname@example.org Tue Mar 15 11:59:40 2005
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:59:21 -0800
From: Micah McNelly <email@example.com>
Anyone on the list involved with this project? I need to speak to
someone ASAP. No, I am not going to pay your ridiculous fine.
SORBS is a one-man operation out of Australia.
I really doubt that he participates in the NORTH AMERICAN network operators
SORBS -- like _any_ other blocklist -- is simply an expression of opinion.
if you feel that "somebody" is 'wrongly' blocking mail because of a SORBS
listing, your _first_ step should be to contact *that* party, and request
that either (a) they stop using SORBS, or (b) that they 'whitelist' you.
*THEY* are the ones that made the decision to block your mail to their
Contact means for SORBS *is* provided on the web-site. it works reliably.
Be advised, however, that a 'need' on your part does not translate to
urgency on the part of anyone else.
Note: *Nobody*, not even SORBS, says you 'have to' make that charitable
contribution. All the 'spam' listings _do_ "age off" the SORBS
Caveat: I have nothing to do with SORBS. I don't use it -- or *any* blocklist,
for that matter -- myself (I use other means that are better suited for _my_
requirements). I don't even know the operator thereof. Everything I've
said is based on published and publicly available information.
"I bet the human brain is a kludge." - Marvin Minsky