North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
- From: Brent Chapman
- Date: Fri Mar 04 12:19:09 2005
What's the state of the art for automated network configuration and
management? What systems and tools are available, either freely or
commercially? Where are these issues being considered and discussed?
I'm not simply talking about network status monitoring systems like
HP OpenView, or device configuration monitoring systems like RANCID,
although those are certainly useful. Instead, I'm talking about
systems that will start from a description of how a network ought to
be configured, and then interact with the various devices on that
network to make it so; something like cfengine for network devices.
Over the last 15 years or so, much of the research in the system
administration field has focused on automation. It's now well
accepted that a well-run operation doesn't manage 10,000 servers
individually, but rather uses tools like cfengine to manage
definitions of those servers and then create instances of those
servers as needed. In the networking world, though, most of us seem
to be still manually configuring (and reconfiguring) every device.
Luke A. Kanies does a good job of explaining the logic behind this
approach in an article he wrote a few years ago at
The key benefits that he sees from automation are:
1) Reducing the amount of time a given task requires.
2) Reducing the opportunity for error in a given task.
3) Reducing turnaround time for a given task.
4) Enhancing and perpetuating configuration consistency across
5) Providing a limited kind of process documentation.
I concur with him about all of those. I think these benefits
(particularly the 4th one, consistency) are critical if your goal is
to offer a reliable service (increasing MTBF and decreasing MTTR).
So, like I asked at the top, where are we on this?
Brent Chapman <Brent@GreatCircle.COM>
Great Circle Associates, Inc.
+1 650 962 0841