North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: marking dynamic ranges, was fixing insecure email infrastructure
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks
- Date: Tue Jan 25 12:23:43 2005
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:03:02 +0100, Markus Stumpf said:
> How did you calculate that "40% of my legitimate email"?
> If you get 60 emails from 60 different hosts that have revDNS and you
> get 40 mails from two hosts without revDNS then also "40% of your
> legitimate email" is coming from servers without revDNS, but in fact
> the precentage of servers without revDNS would be around 3.2%. Quite
> a difference.
Which would mean that if Suresh insisted on revDNS, he'd end up blocking
only 2 hosts, but 40% of his legitimate mail would be dropped on the floor.
I'd *hope* that knowingly dropping 40% of the *legitimate* mail on the floor
would be considered a CLM. But these days some providers seem to think
"all of Europe" is a reasonable filter.....
Description: PGP signature