North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
fwd: Re: [registrars] Re: panix.com hijacked
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Date: Sun Jan 16 10:25:36 2005
Delivery of RC mail to me is fairly desultory. Apparently there is an
earlier thread. Post-Rome the very purpose of the RC seems to me to be
doubtful (advocacy for registrars other than NetSol+4), and post-Elana
the process of the RC left me disinterested.
I'm particularly enamored by Ross' notion of what is going on on NANOG.
------- Forwarded Message
Delivery-Date: Sun Jan 16 11:14:04 2005
Received: from greenriver.icann.org (greenriver.icann.org [188.8.131.52])
by nic-naa.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0GBDxgx036293
for <email@example.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:14:04 GMT
Received: from greenriver.icann.org (greenriver [127.0.0.1])
by greenriver.icann.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0GEx1Qg006202;
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 06:59:01 -0800
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
by greenriver.icann.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j0GEx0hJ006201;
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 06:59:01 -0800
X-Authentication-Warning: greenriver.icann.org: majordomo set sender to firstname.lastname@example.org using -f
Received: from pechora.icann.org (pechora.icann.org [184.108.40.206])
by greenriver.icann.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0GEwxrw006198
for <email@example.com>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 06:59:00 -0800
Received: from tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net [220.127.116.11])
by pechora.icann.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j0GEwBA16293
for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 06:58:11 -0800
Received: from [192.168.2.101] ([18.104.22.168])
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:58:57 -0500
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:57:03 -0500
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <email@example.com>
Organization: Tucows Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Mark Jeftovic <firstname.lastname@example.org>
CC: Registrars Constituency <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [registrars] Re: panix.com hijacked
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 1/16/2005 12:29 AM Mark Jeftovic noted that:
> There's a thread on NANOG to the effect that panix.com has been
> hijacked from Dotster over to MelbourneIT and it has pretty
> well taken panix.com and its customers offline, see
I don't see what you are looking at - .net and .com point to the same
place with no indication of anything awry...of course, I'm late to the
game and the DNS probably tells a different story...
> Looks like this may be among the first high-profile unauthorized
> transfer under the new transfer policy.
Looks like a bunch of guys on the NANOG list engaging in a lot of
conjecture without the benefit of a lot of facts.
> Maybe there needs to some sort of emergency reversion where at least the
> nameservers can be rolled back immediately while the contesting parties
> sort it out.
Might be interesting - what criteria would trigger the process?
"In the modern world the intelligence of public opinion is the one
indispensable condition for social progress."
- Charles W. Eliot (1834 - 1926)
------- End of Forwarded Message