Re: fixing insecure email infrastructure (was: Re: [eweek article]

[Owen DeLong]

That's bad sincd DNAME is deprecated and has been removed from BIND.

Owen


--On Friday, January 14, 2005 10:05 +1100 Mark Andrews 
<Mark_Andrews@isc.org> wrote:

> > What is wrong with MTAMARK?
> 	As currently described it doesn't fit well with RFC 2317
> 	style delegations.  They would need to be converted to use
> 	DNAME instead of CNAME which requires all the delegating
> 	servers to be upgraded to support DNAME.
>
> 	There are other issues but hear is not the correct place
> 	to debate them.
--
If this message was not signed with gpg key 0FE2AA3D, it's probably
a forgery.

Attachment: pgp00015.pgp
Description: PGP signature