North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: [eweek article] Window of "anonymity" when domain exists, whoisnot updated yet
- From: Owen DeLong
- Date: Wed Jan 12 13:36:40 2005
I think that a secure email infrastructure is a good
thing to have, in and of itself. By secure, I mean
one in which messages get to their destination reliably,
i.e. not lost in some spam filter, and one in which
a recipient can reliably know where the message came
from if they feel the need to track down the sender by
And how is it that OpenPGP and S/MIME do not meet this criteria?
Why is it that we also need to break the transport layer to
facilitate what you describe above?
a protocol change. Forcing people to relay all email
through their ISP's mail system is an operational change.
Forcing people to relay all email through their ISP's mail system
is a wet dream of anti-free-speech governments, too.
Why should I have to provide non-encrypted information about my
email to my ISP just to get it to my friend's mail server?
Why on earth do you think that is a legitimate operational
change? Having to route telephone calls through the telephone
company is an unfortunate fact of infrastructure which we don't
currently have with Email. CALEA is a clear demonstration of
why this is not necessarily a good thing. Why would you
ever want to consider relegating email to these same restrictions?
In a sense, I am suggesting a similar reallocation of resources.
Rather than put those resources into filtering spam, I'd suggest
that we will get a better result by shifting the resources into
mail relaying and managing mail peering agreements. The spam will
continue but users will move to using the secure mail architecture
and won't see most of it. When the spammers also shift, there will
be more tools to track them down or shut them down or simply to rate
The problem is that currently, most ISPs don't relay mail for other ISPs.
Currently, you look up the MX and send to the end-system. What you are
proposing, in order to preserve existing mail connectivity under your new
system, would require EVERY ISP on the planet to MAIL PEER directly with
every other ISP on the planet, OR, a new mail routing protocol with ISPs
providing MAIL RELAY for every transit customer. UG-LY!!
If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
Description: PGP signature