North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Sensible geographical addressing
- From: David Barak
- Date: Tue Nov 30 10:36:20 2004
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=J+unOS0UVTTVZZySIyJBmoPcdB+StlXToyyjEE+dV+8p2oKXmfulRxJFIhBZtBfnk8vCWClu4ian7j8LGRstPrS/8YMjHGe3DQfIX2GJuEr24sXObQTlCIWBZxYvEHdvQ5wJTUQ4GNdJ0vq2vjCe8ifRlN1uBXcobBMQBpRki7A= ;
--- Peter Corlett <abuse@cabal.org.uk> wrote:
>
> David Barak <thegameiam@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [...]
> > What exactly would be so bad about taking a page
> from the PSTN and
> > using a country-code-like system? There are under
> 200 countries on
> > the whole planet, so that's not a huge number of
> bits...
>
> Not that this avoids renumbering, as countries do
> occasionally split
> or merge. Sometimes there's also address space
> exhaustion within a
> country and renumbering is required.
>
> (I am reminded of a Londoner whining about "loads"
> of number changes
> since 1990. In fact, there have been just three: 01
> -> 071/081 ->
> 0171/0181 -> 020.)
>
But if the "country ID" bits were always in a defined
place, the pain of renumbering due to country
merge/split could be mitigated. In any case,
countries don't split or merge THAT much.
=====
David Barak
-fully RFC 1925 compliant-
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
|
