North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI
- From: Leo Bicknell
- Date: Sat Nov 27 22:05:30 2004
In a message written on Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 06:25:52PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> All I hear is how this company or that enterprise "should qualify" for
> PI space. What I don't hear is what's going to happen when the routing
> tables grow too large, or how to prevent this. I think just about
> anyone "should qualify", but ONLY if there is some form of aggregation
> possible. PI in IPv6 without aggregation would be a bigger mistake than
> all other IPv6 mistakes so far.
I find it interesting that no operators are screaming that there will be
too many routes, but that all the IPv6 researchers are bringing forth
this view.
8 years too late guys. We've figured out table management.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
pgp00100.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|
