North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: [OT] Good Anti-Spam Boilerplate
- From: Charles Sprickman
- Date: Fri Oct 08 17:30:58 2004
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> After some senseless Googling, I'm at a loss. I'm looking for a very
> comprehensive, up-to-date example of an AUP that covers spam. When I say
> "modern", I mean that I want it to include not just direct spamming, but
> abuse of remote open-relays, abuse of remote trojaned boxes, sending
> through a third party that circumvents the local AUP, etc. Some good
> definition of "requested email" would be great - ie: double opt-in, or
> single opt-in with some documentation that the user requested the mail on
> a web form or similar.
> Some language that covers penalties would also be helpful, such as
> equipment seizure for non-payment of penalties.
> Please reply privately and I'll summarize. I do not wish to get into any
> debates about what qualifies as spam on this list.
Replying to myself here...
Thanks to everyone. I'd missed the spamhaus "spam definition" which will
be very helpful in wording a few things. And the prize for "best TOS"
goes to Steve Sobol from "justthe.net". This one is great:
I especially like the pdf generator. :)
Now I'll have to see what the lawyer thinks.
Thanks again everyone,
> Charles Sprickman