North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks
- Date: Tue May 18 17:22:35 2004
On Tue, 18 May 2004 16:56:30 EDT, "Christopher X. Candreva" <firstname.lastname@example.org> said:
> But if you really need a reason to convince someone who won't get their head
> out of their . . . the sand -- You can probably cut in half the number of
> viruses you have to scan if you reject invalid addresses up front, meaning
> you can buy a smaller/ fewer virus scanner(s).
> Which means the companies making them have absolutely no incentive to add
> this feature.
Right. Mirapoints are that way too (at least in our configuration). And yes,
we'll probably have to buy a 5th Mirapoint and/or upgrade our current 4 sooner
because of it - but the incremental cost for that is *still* lower than the
cost of replacing them with another vendor's gear....
Now how do you explain to the CFO that in order to get around a $50K upgrade
to the current gear, you want to spend $200K to bring in another vendor? :)
Description: PGP signature