Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Cisco's Statement about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure

  • From: Valdis.Kletnieks
  • Date: Thu May 13 11:52:58 2004

On Wed, 12 May 2004 21:51:53 EDT, Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org>  said:

> Gimme a break.  This text is a half-baked concoction at best if the next
> draft still doesn't mention port randomization as a cheap and effective
> mitigator for external attack attempts.  You can get at least 14 bits of
> entropy for one lousy arc4random() call.  Enter as often as you like.  No
> purchase required.
> 
> With this and the patent funny business, I don't know if I can roll my eyes
> any further into the back of my head.

Well.. you have to remember that we live in an environment where people
are *just* noticing that RFC793 says "The RST has to be in the window,
not dead on"... and apparently overnight somebody has re-discovered the
fact that CSMA/CA networks will fall over if somebody starts jabbering:

http://www.auscert.org.au/render.html?it=4091


Attachment: pgp00016.pgp
Description: PGP signature




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.