Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: WAN transfer rates

  • From: Bora Akyol
  • Date: Tue May 11 19:47:44 2004

I think the real answer is more complex, if I remember this correctly:

The real transfer results depend on a lot of things, but the foremost
parameter that dominates the transfer rates for a single TCP session is
the duration of the session. If the session is short-lived, regardless of what the maximum window size is, the transfer rate will be abysmal unless the TCP stack is modified to guesstimate the initial window.

For long lived TCP sessions, you want to have enough packets in flight to fill the bandwidth delay product of the link to get the maximum throughput.

Mark Allman, Sally Floyd, and quite a few other people have published numerous papers on this topic.

Essentially the answer is that the transfer rates diminish with increasing latency if and only if the sessions are short-lived.
This becomes a huge problem especially on high bandwidth satellite links where some real "interesting" TCP hacks are employed. Now add a DNS lookup or two to the beginning of the sessions and things really start
to look bad for short-duration traffic over high latency links.

When you have many TCP sessions competing for the same link, then things start to look up.


Bora Akyol

On 11-mei-04, at 10:24, Jeff Nelson wrote:

I realize that transfer rates across the Internet diminish significantly
with latency, but what's the good answer for someone shrunk down to
<10Mbps when the smallest pipe between them is 100Mbps and latency is

Discussion Communities

About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home

Merit Network, Inc.