North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: MD5 proliferation statistics
- From: John Kristoff
- Date: Fri May 07 10:22:45 2004
On Thu, 6 May 2004 17:52:16 -0400
"Patrick W.Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> wrote:
> Unfortunately, my organization was not passive until we got to see what
> the threat actually was, so our numbers are not useful. Would any
> traffic-carrying-organization care to discuss their numbers?
<http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/0109/msg01381.html>
After that post, DePaul's peering sessions peaked at about 50. If I'm
not mistaken, only 1 new peer would not do MD5. The number doing MD5
for the first time probably went up slightly as well. In the end, one
of those organizations who wouldn't do MD5 is no longer in operation
and another, well, I'm here now and that was something on my list of
to-do's. :-)
John
|
