North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: worm information
- From: Christopher J. Wolff
- Date: Sat Apr 10 14:52:03 2004
Ravi,
One of the responses to this thread mentioned a 3COM switch. One of the
infected sites has a 3COM superstack 1100. I'm not a 3COM fan but these
switches have been up for years, literally. All it takes to make this
switch reboot is a flow from one infected host. I'm going to try to move
the web interface port away from 80. Thank you.
Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
> ravi pina
> Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 11:44 AM
> To: Christopher J. Wolff
> Cc: ravi@cow.org; 'Darrell Greenwood'; 'nanog list'
> Subject: Re: worm information
>
>
> hmm, honestly i can't vouch for the data rate personally.
> a co-worker said the counters on the VPN connections were
> grossly disproportionate for a short time sample.
>
> bottom line, it is indeed annoying. i know my server
> and desktop groups have been having a hell of a time
> disinfecting hosts. i know part of this was that
> symantec, at the time, said it may be a polymorphic
> strain.
>
> -r
|
