North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Firewall opinions wanted please
- From: Rachael Treu
- Date: Wed Mar 17 12:25:31 2004
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 08:54:57AM -0800, bill said something to the effect of:
> > > The best option I guess is to figure out how important it is for you to have a firewall,
> > _Everyone_ (network connected) should have a firewall. My grandma should
> > have a firewall. Nicole, holding dominion over this business network and
> > its critical infrastructure, should _definitely_ have a firewall. ;)
> Why? When did the end2end nature of the Internet suddenly
> sprout these mutant bits of extra complexity that reduce
> the overall security of the 'net?
> Two questions asked, Two answers are sufficent.
Nope. One will do it. The day the first remote exploit or condition,
in protocol or application, that could potentially have given rise to such
and exploit made it possible for a user not in your control to gain control
of your box(en), firewalling became necessary. Then Internet is not exactly
end-to-end beyond pure fundamentals; it's more end-to-many-ends. And the
notion of "end-to-end" requires preservation of a connection between 2
consenting hosts, and preservation includes securement of that connection
against destructive mechanisms, which includes the subversive techniques and
intercetptions commonly associated with network security.
Denial of Service is as much a threat to availability and network
functionality as is power outage if it occurs. Before this turns to a "you
security freaks want to screw around with my network and don't care about
Firewalls are logical interventions, costing as little as some processor
overhead. Dedicated appliances are only one deployment. Filters on
routers also qualify as firewalls. Am I correct in understanding that you
feel edge filtering is mutant lunacy and unnecessary complexity?
Regarding dedicated firewalls, please see Mr. Bellovin's previous post
regarding appropriate and competent administration. The lack thereof
presents the complication, not the countermeasure itself.
As for your assertion that firewalls "reduce the overall security of the
'net."...can you please elaborate on that, as well? Other factions might/do
argue that it's the other team refusing to lock their doors at night that
are perpetuating the flux of bad behavior as a close second to the ignorant
k. rachael treu, CISSP email@example.com
..quis costodiet ipsos custodes?..