North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Firewall opinions wanted please
- From: Burton, Chris
- Date: Tue Mar 16 19:14:26 2004
Depends on many aspects; performance, management, and logging
features. I personally recommend Checkpoint FW-1 Express for a smaller
site if you want easy configuration and a great logging interface;
though the pricing may not be what you are looking for. Cisco PIX is
also great but the management and logging aspects in my opinion are not
up to par with Checkpoint on the lower price end (i.e. Without
investment in other management tools). It goes back to what you and
anyone supporting the platform will be comfortable with.
Walt Disney Internet Group: Network Services
The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential,
intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If
the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, or the employee
or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please contact Walt Disney Internet Group at
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:27 PM
Subject: Firewall opinions wanted please
I am looking for a good but reasonably priced firewall for a 40 or so
site. Some people swear by Pix, others swear at it a lot. Also I have
good things about Netscreen. Or any others you would recommend for
servers on a busy network. Don't really need anything with VPN just the
standard http, ftp, ssh, https, type traffic up to 100mb throughput.
From what I have heard a proxy firewall would be best?
Thanks in advance!!
|\ __ /| (`\
| o_o |__ ) )
- firstname.lastname@example.org - Powered by FreeBSD -
" Daemons" will now be known as "spiritual guides"
-Politically Correct UNIX Page