Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Anti-spam System Idea

  • From: Timothy R. McKee
  • Date: Mon Feb 16 16:21:19 2004

Personally I don't see where ingress filters that only allow registered 
SMTP servers to initiate TCP connections on port 25 is irresponsible.

Any user sophisticated enough to legitimately require a running SMTP server 
should also have the sophistication to create a dns entry and register it
with
his upstream in whatever manner is required.
 
There will never be a painless or easy solution to this problem, only a 
choice where we select the lesser of all evils.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Petri Helenius [mailto:pete@he.iki.fi] 
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 16:06
To: Timothy R. McKee
Cc: 'J Bacher'; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Anti-spam System Idea

Timothy R. McKee wrote:

>There will *never* be a concerted action by all service providers to 
>filter ingress/egress on abused ports unless there is a legal 
>requirement to do so.  Think 'level playing field'...
>  
>
Havenīt it been stated enough times previously that blindly blocking ports
is irresponsible?

There are ways to similar, if not more accurate results without resorting to
shooting everything that moves.

Pete





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.