Beginning February 01 2004
Messages: 1006
Page 1 of 1
First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

The North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) provides a forum for the exchange of technical information, and promotes discussion of implementation issues that require community cooperation.

There are several methods for joining the nanog list.

This archive is updated hourly. The searchable index is updated nightly.

Date, Thread, Author,
Historical

Other Merit Archives

How to Join an E-Mail List

'isaac@ravengate.net'

• 02/24/04 Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks- Than
  

Guðbjörn Hreinsson

• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  

Guðbjörn S. Hreinsson

• 02/18/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/18/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/18/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  

Savitha Kumar

• 02/10/04 Re: Need some info on network management
  
• 02/10/04 Need some info on network management
  

Aaron Thomas

• 02/04/04 Data Center Building Considerations
  

Adam 'Starblazer' Romberg

• 02/01/04 Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A r
  

Adam Rothschild

• 02/28/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  

Adi Linden

• 02/10/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/06/04 Stopping open proxies and open relays
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  

alex

• 02/24/04 Sprint and AT&T backbone engineer
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  

Alex Bligh

• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/20/04 Re: Anycast and windows servers
  
• 02/18/04 RE: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 RE: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 RE: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/12/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  

Alex Kamantauskas

• 02/09/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Alex Rubenstein

• 02/24/04 Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 ev
  
• 02/13/04 Nortel Optera 5200's
  

Alexander Bochmann

• 02/03/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  

Alexander Hagen

• 02/09/04 RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a
  
• 02/07/04 Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub
  

Alexander Kiwerski

• 02/20/04 RE: whois.internic.net problems?
  
• 02/12/04 RE: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  

Alexei Roudnev

• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/04/04 Re: Latest IE patch breaking non usernam
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Latest IE patch breaking non usernam
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  
• 02/02/04 Re: SCO blames ISPs for blocking access
  

Alfred Lee

• 02/17/04 Commerce IPv6 RFC News
  

Andre Chapuis

• 02/24/04 Re: 168.0.0.0/6
  
• 02/21/04 PAIX Palo-Alto
  

Andrew - Supernews

• 02/22/04 Re: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  
• 02/08/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/08/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  

Andy Dills

• 02/14/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  
• 02/13/04 RE: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  

Andy Smith

• 02/09/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  

Andy Warner

• 02/09/04 RE: abusereporting
  

Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.

• 02/22/04 Spam and the Law Conference Presentation
  

Arjan Lugtenberg

• 02/23/04 RE: possible L3 issues
  
• 02/23/04 RE: possible L3 issues
  

Arnold Nipper

• 02/10/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  

Avleen Vig

• 02/22/04 Re: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  

bcm

• 02/09/04 Yahoo DNS issue
  

Ben Browning

• 02/11/04 PING: blacklist.mail.ops.worldnet.att.ne
  

Ben Crosby

• 02/13/04 Wireless Pt-Pt in Washington DC ?
  

bill

• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/17/04 Re: NTIA/DoC public comment period
  
• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  
• 02/04/04 CULPRIT - poor connectivity to new b.roo
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/02/04 wildly successful
  
• 02/01/04 Re: updated root hints file (fwd)
  
• 02/01/04 Re: updated root hints file (fwd)
  

Bill Thompson

• 02/02/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  

Bill Woodcock

• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Data center design ideas
  

Bob German

• 02/03/04 RE: Latest IE patch breaking non usernam
  

Bob Snyder

• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

Bora Akyol

• 02/25/04 RE: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/25/04 RE: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  

Bradley Dunn

• 02/01/04 Re: What happened to dot pro... (BTW)
  

Brent_OKeeffe

• 02/04/04 Re: Road Runner refusing us, others?
  

Brett Watson

• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  

Brian (nanog-list)

• 02/02/04 Strange public traceroutes return privat
  

Brian Bruns

• 02/26/04 Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement:
  
• 02/26/04 Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement:
  
• 02/26/04 Microsoft on security holes
  
• 02/24/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/23/04 Re: T1 Customer CPE Replacement?
  
• 02/12/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  
• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  
• 02/01/04 Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup s
  

Brian Knoblauch

• 02/26/04 RE: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  

Brian Wallingford

• 02/12/04 Interesting BIND error
  

Bruce Campbell

• 02/01/04 Re: updated root hints file (fwd)
  

Bryan Heitman

• 02/03/04 Re: Latest IE patch breaking non usernam
  

Buhrmaster, Gary

• 02/20/04 RE: Anycast and windows servers
  

Burton, Chris

• 02/04/04 RE: Data Center Building Considerations
  

Cathy Murphy

• 02/10/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  

Charles Sprickman

• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  

Chen, Weijing

• 02/17/04 RE: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 RE: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  

Chris Adams

• 02/23/04 Re: T1 Customer CPE Replacement?
  
• 02/12/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  
• 02/08/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  

Chris Brenton

• 02/06/04 RE: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  

Chris Horry

• 02/17/04 Problems on ATDN this evening?
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  

Chris Ranch

• 02/23/04 RE: Genu/L3 Major Outage
  
• 02/23/04 RE: possible L3 issues
  
• 02/23/04 Genu/L3 Major Outage
  

Chris Woodfield

• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Chris Yarnell

• 02/25/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/09/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Christopher Aldridge

• 02/29/04 First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
  

Christopher Chin

• 02/18/04 Cogeco Cable listening?
  

Christopher L. Morrow

• 02/16/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/01/04 Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A r
  

Christopher X. Candreva

• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Need abuse contact for Yahoo Hostinn
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Need abuse contact for Yahoo Hostinn
  
• 02/02/04 Need abuse contact for Yahoo Hostinng
  

CHUNIKHIN Igor FTLD

• 02/01/04 RE: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  

cidr-report

• 02/27/04 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/20/04 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/13/04 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/08/04 The Cidr Report
  
• 02/06/04 The Cidr Report
  

Claydon, Tom

• 02/23/04 T1 Customer CPE Replacement?
  
• 02/04/04 Cisco: limit number of DHCP addresses pe
  

Colin Neeson

• 02/24/04 Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 ev
  

Crist Clark

• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/12/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  

Curtis Maurand

• 02/25/04 Re: T1 Customer CPE Replacement?
  
• 02/24/04 Re: T1 Customer CPE Replacement?
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/23/04 Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks
  
• 02/11/04 Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder
  
• 02/10/04 Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder
  
• 02/06/04 RE: Verizon Mail Troubles
  
• 02/06/04 RE: Verizon Mail Troubles
  

dan

• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  

Dan Ellis

• 02/13/04 RE: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  
• 02/13/04 SMTP relaying policies for Commercial IS
  
• 02/12/04 RE: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/10/04 SMTP authentication for broadband provid
  

Dan Hollis

• 02/24/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/24/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Daniel Concepcion

• 02/22/04 Re: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  

Daniel Karrenberg

• 02/24/04 Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/24/04 Proposal: De-boganising New Address Bloc
  
• 02/24/04 Re: 168.0.0.0/6
  

Daniel Reed

• 02/17/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  
• 02/16/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  
• 02/16/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/16/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  
• 02/13/04 RE: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  

Daniel Senie

• 02/28/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/22/04 Re: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  
• 02/20/04 Re: Anycast and windows servers
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  

Danny McPherson

• 02/14/04 Re: BGP - weight
  

Dave Crocker

• 02/18/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/18/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  

Dave O'Shea

• 02/25/04 Sprint midwest/NW backbone issues?
  

Dave Stewart

• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  

Dave Temkin

• 02/20/04 RouteScience PathControl vs. Radware Lin
  

David A. Ulevitch

• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

David Barak

• 02/26/04 Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement:
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  

David G. Andersen

• 02/23/04 L3 burp today - what happened?
  

David Lesher

• 02/21/04 Re: M$ CD patches
  
• 02/21/04 M$ CD patches
  
• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Verizon mail troubles
  

David Luyer

• 02/10/04 RE: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

David Meyer

• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  

David Monosov

• 02/10/04 A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder
  

David Schwartz

• 02/26/04 RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/03/04 RE: Latest IE patch breaking non usernam
  

Deepak Jain

• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/26/04 ICANN/Registry Agreement:
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/26/04 Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few words o
  
• 02/22/04 BL of Compromised Hosts?
  
• 02/18/04 Re: 80/udp floods?
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  
• 02/04/04 Re: Data Center Building Considerations
  

Dmitri Krioukov

• 02/06/04 RE: greylisting
  
• 02/06/04 RE: greylisting
  
• 02/06/04 greylisting
  

Don Gould

• 02/17/04 RE: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  

Donovan Hill

• 02/09/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  
• 02/09/04 Root Servers Request
  

doug

• 02/09/04 Re: Network and security experts (was Re
  

Doug Barton

• 02/06/04 Re: updated root hints file (fwd)
  
• 02/03/04 Re: updated root hints file
  

Dr. Jeffrey Race

• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/18/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses (here's o
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  

Drew Weaver

• 02/10/04 Looking for someone who is very experien
  
• 02/06/04 Monumentous task of making a list of all
  

Duane Wessels

• 02/04/04 Re: Latest IE patch breaking non usernam
  

E.B. Dreger

• 02/17/04 Re: Analogies=dead threads (was RE:Open,
  
• 02/15/04 Re: BGP - weight
  
• 02/14/04 Re: BGP - weight
  
• 02/14/04 Re: BGP - weight
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Outbound Route Optimization
  
• 02/01/04 Re: MS is vulnerable
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Impending (mydoom) DOS attack
  

Edward Lewis

• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  

Ejay Hire

• 02/13/04 RE: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  
• 02/11/04 RE: PING: blacklist.mail.ops.worldnet.at
  
• 02/03/04 RE: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  
• 02/02/04 Unbelievable Spam.
  

Elkind_Rob

• 02/19/04 Verizon clients DOS own site?
  

Enrico Riedel

• 02/11/04 [University at Buffalo] MAN/MEN Research
  

Eric A. Hall

• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine

• 02/27/04 Sail Ho! (was Re: Lawsuit on ICANN ...)
  
• 02/27/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/20/04 Re: Verisign wins an award...
  

Eric Kuhnke

• 02/26/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/18/04 Equinix 350 E. Cermak - Contact Please
  

Erik Haagsman

• 02/25/04 RE: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/24/04 RE: possible L3 issues
  

Erik-Jan Bos

• 02/03/04 Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  

Etaoin Shrdlu

• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  

Fowlie, Colin

• 02/23/04 RE: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks
  

frank

• 02/19/04 Istanbul / Turkey Area
  

Frank P. Troy

• 02/09/04 Hardening a control plane
  

garrett.allen

• 02/08/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/07/04 question on ptr rr
  

Gary E. Miller

• 02/23/04 Re: L3 burp today - what happened?
  
• 02/23/04 Re: possible L3 issues
  

Geo.

• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/21/04 RE: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/21/04 routing invalid IP addresses
  

George Michaelson

• 02/09/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  

German Martinez

• 02/23/04 Re: possible L3 issues
  

Gregh

• 02/09/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  

Gregory Hicks

• 02/09/04 [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "Site
  

Guy Coslado (GC0111)

• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Hani Mustafa

• 02/04/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

Hank Nussbacher

• 02/25/04 Re: 168.0.0.0/6
  
• 02/11/04 Re: 7500 and DCEF
  

Henry Linneweh

• 02/16/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  

Herman Harless

• 02/03/04 RE: Latest IE patch breaking non usernam
  
• 02/03/04 Latest IE patch breaking non username:pa
  

Iljitsch van Beijnum

• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a
  
• 02/06/04 Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public tracerout
  
• 02/04/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/04/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

Ing. Hans L. Reyes

• 02/20/04 Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks
  

Ingevaldson, Dan (ISS Atlanta)

• 02/06/04 RE: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/04/04 ISS X-Force Security Advisories on Check
  

isaac

• 02/20/04 eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks
  

J Bacher

• 02/16/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  

J. Oquendo

• 02/23/04 Re: possible L3 issues (more than LAX/SJ
  
• 02/21/04 MS can't live with it can't live... with
  
• 02/04/04 Contact needed for CERFnet?
  
• 02/04/04 Re: Data Center Building Considerations
  
• 02/01/04 Re: What happened to dot pro... (BTW)
  

Jake Khuon

• 02/23/04 Re: Genu/L3 Major Outage
  

james

• 02/27/04 Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to
  
• 02/21/04 Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks
  

James Edwards

• 02/27/04 Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  

Jamie Reid

• 02/10/04 IDS data.
  

Jared Mauch

• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 Converged Networks Threat (Was: Level3 O
  
• 02/04/04 Re: CULPRIT - poor connectivity to new b
  

Jason Lixfeld

• 02/07/04 Re: Lame Yahoo social engineering scam
  

Jason McCormick

• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  

Jason Nealis

• 02/24/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/24/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Jay Hennigan

• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  

JC Dill

• 02/17/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  
• 02/12/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  

Jeff Shultz

• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  

Jeff Workman

• 02/03/04 Re: Latest IE patch breaking non usernam
  

Jeroen Massar

• 02/27/04 RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/24/04 RE: 168.0.0.0/6
  
• 02/11/04 RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  

Jesper Skriver

• 02/07/04 Re: Cisco: limit number of DHCP addresse
  

Jess Kitchen

• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  

jlewis

• 02/24/04 RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/14/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/14/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  
• 02/12/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  
• 02/09/04 RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a
  
• 02/02/04 Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  

Joe Abley

• 02/25/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/19/04 Re: Anycast and windows servers
  
• 02/12/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  

Joe Loiacono

• 02/11/04 Re: animations from "Making Sense of BGP
  

Joe Maimon

• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  

joe mcguckin

• 02/26/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  

Joe Provo

• 02/24/04 Re: 168.0.0.0/6
  

Joe St Sauver

• 02/16/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  

Joel Jaeggli

• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/09/04 Re: P2P open source blocking project
  
• 02/03/04 RE: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

John Kinsella

• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  

John Kristoff

• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  

John L Crain

• 02/03/04 Re[2]: B.root-servers renumbering
  

John Neiberger

• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  

John Obi

• 02/20/04 XO contact.
  
• 02/09/04 RE: SECURITY: Abuse & upnormal traffic i
  
• 02/08/04 Fwd: SECURITY: Abuse & upnormal traffic
  
• 02/06/04 ev1.net security contact
  

John Palmer

• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  

John Payne

• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/04/04 Re: CULPRIT - poor connectivity to new b
  

John R Levine

• 02/12/04 New subgroups in the IRTF ASRG
  
• 02/01/04 Re: What happened to dot pro... (BTW)
  
• 02/01/04 Re: What happened to dot pro... (BTW)
  
• 02/01/04 What happened to dot pro ?
  

jon bennett

• 02/24/04 SIGCOMM Workshop on Network Troubleshoot
  

Jon Mitchell

• 02/18/04 Re: Problems on ATDN this evening?
  

Jon R. Kibler

• 02/20/04 whois.internic.net problems?
  
• 02/16/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  

Jonas Frey (Probe Networks)

• 02/02/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

Jonathan Nichols

• 02/18/04 firstam.com contact
  

Joseph Noonan

• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  

Joshua Coombs

• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

joshua sahala

• 02/25/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  

Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino

• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 Re: NTIA/DoC public comment period
  
• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 Re: NTIA/DoC public comment period
  
• 02/10/04 RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegation?
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  

just me

• 02/17/04 An alternate plan for reducing spam
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  

ken emery

• 02/24/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Ken Leland

• 02/06/04 Re: greylisting
  

Kevin Oberman

• 02/09/04 Re: Network and security experts (was Re
  
• 02/05/04 Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public tracerout
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

kwallace

• 02/23/04 RE: possible L3 issues
  
• 02/23/04 possible L3 issues
  

Lars Erik Gullerud

• 02/03/04 Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  

Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.

• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 Re: ICANN/Registry Agreement:
  
• 02/26/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/14/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/05/04 Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public tracerout
  
• 02/05/04 Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public tracerout
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/05/04 Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public tracerout
  

Lawrence Baldwin

• 02/16/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  

Leo Bicknell

• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

Leo Vegoda

• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  
• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  

Leslie Nobile

• 02/24/04 REMINDER: ARIN to allocate from 70.0.0.0
  

Lou Katz

• 02/12/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  

M. David Leonard

• 02/05/04 Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public tracerout
  

Malayter, Christopher

• 02/04/04 Sup2/MSFC2 Working netflow config for hy
  

Mark Andrews

• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  

Mark E. Mallett

• 02/11/04 Re: PING: blacklist.mail.ops.worldnet.at
  

Mark Foster

• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  

Mark Jeftovic

• 02/27/04 RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/04/04 Road Runner refusing us, others?
  

Mark Jones

• 02/16/04 Spam issue discussion lists [was Re: Ant
  

Mark Segal

• 02/11/04 RE: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  

Mark Turpin

• 02/17/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  

Mark.Andrews

• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  

Marshall Eubanks

• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  

Martin Hepworth

• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  

matt

• 02/17/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  

Matthew Crocker

• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/09/04 Where can I find a list of IPs and their
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

Matthew Kaufman

• 02/03/04 does your ISP need more peering?
  

Matthew Sullivan

• 02/13/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  
• 02/12/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/04/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  
• 02/02/04 Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello
  

matthew zeier

• 02/15/04 power outage in LA?
  

McBurnett, Jim

• 02/06/04 RE: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  

Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law

• 02/26/04 RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  

Michael Loftis

• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Michael Painter

• 02/27/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  

Michael Smith

• 02/26/04 Best Common Practice - Listening to loca
  

Michael Wiacek

• 02/29/04 Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm
  
• 02/14/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  

Michael.Dillon

• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/26/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/24/04 Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/24/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/18/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/18/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  
• 02/17/04 Data center design ideas
  
• 02/16/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/16/04 Re: Identifying IP address types
  
• 02/16/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/12/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/10/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/09/04 Re: P2P open source blocking project
  
• 02/09/04 Applying HD Ratio to all IPv4 allocation
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public tracerout
  
• 02/04/04 RE: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 RE: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  

Michel Py

• 02/24/04 RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address
  
• 02/24/04 RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/24/04 RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/23/04 RE: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  
• 02/22/04 O/T: fake identity seal was: RE: M$ CD p
  
• 02/22/04 RE: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  
• 02/22/04 RE: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  
• 02/21/04 RE: M$ CD patches
  
• 02/21/04 RE: M$ CD patches
  
• 02/09/04 RE: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/04/04 RE: Road Runner refusing us, others?
  

Mikael Abrahamsson

• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/08/04 abusereporting (was Re: Monumentous task
  

Mike Jezierski - BOFH

• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  

Mike Lewinski

• 02/12/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  

Mike Tancsa

• 02/02/04 other virus damages/costs.....(hello sky
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  

Miquel van Smoorenburg

• 02/12/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  

Mr. James W. Laferriere

• 02/13/04 Cisco Secure ACS Solution Engine-a 1-RU
  

Nathan J. Mehl

• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  

Neil J. McRae

• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  

Nicole

• 02/17/04 RE: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  

Niels Bakker

• 02/24/04 Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 ev
  
• 02/16/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

Omar

• 02/04/04 [OT] need att.net postmaster contact
  

Patrick W.Gilmore

• 02/27/04 Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to
  
• 02/27/04 Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to
  
• 02/19/04 Re: Anycast and windows servers
  

Paul E

• 02/07/04 hotmail postmaster contact?
  

Paul Jakma

• 02/28/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/19/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  

Paul Vixie

• 02/28/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/24/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder
  
• 02/10/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/09/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/08/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/08/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/07/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/07/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/04/04 Re: here are some postfix patterns i fou
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  

Paul Wouters

• 02/10/04 RE: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Pekka Savola

• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/10/04 WG Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-isp-scena
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

Pendergrass, Greg

• 02/27/04 RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/26/04 RE: How relable does the Internet need t
  

Pete Templin

• 02/25/04 Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 ev
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 ev
  
• 02/23/04 Re: BGP, MED, Confederation presentation
  

Petri Helenius

• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/24/04 Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/16/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/14/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/01/04 Re: SCO
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  
• 02/01/04 Re: SCO blames ISPs for blocking access
  

Philip J. Nesser II

• 02/09/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  

Rafi Sadowsky

• 02/22/04 Re: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  

Rainer Atkins

• 02/17/04 Analogies=dead threads (was RE:Open, ano
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  

Randall Pigott

• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Randy Bush

• 02/29/04 Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
  
• 02/26/04 RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/25/04 Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/25/04 Re: 168.0.0.0/6
  
• 02/24/04 Re: 168.0.0.0/6
  
• 02/24/04 Re: 168.0.0.0/6
  
• 02/24/04 Re: 168.0.0.0/6
  
• 02/24/04 168.0.0.0/6
  
• 02/23/04 RE: Genu/L3 Major Outage
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/10/04 Re: IDS data.
  
• 02/10/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/10/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/10/04 RE: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/08/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/07/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/07/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/07/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public tracerout
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/02/04 Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello
  
• 02/01/04 Re: updated root hints file (fwd)
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  

Ray Bellis

• 02/20/04 Verisign wins an award...
  

Raymond Dijkxhoorn

• 02/23/04 RE: possible L3 issues
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  
• 02/01/04 Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A r
  

Richard A Steenbergen

• 02/23/04 Re: possible L3 issues
  
• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

Richard Welty

• 02/02/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  

Rob Pickering

• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  

Robert Boyle

• 02/20/04 Re: Anycast and windows servers
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  

Robert E. Seastrom

• 02/22/04 Re: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/04/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/02/04 Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup s
  

Robin Lynn Frank

• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  

Roland Perry

• 02/29/04 Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
  
• 02/29/04 Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
  
• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 How relable does the Internet need to be
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  

Roman Volf

• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  

Ron da Silva

• 02/29/04 Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
  
• 02/29/04 Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
  

Ronald van der Pol

• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  

Roy

• 02/17/04 RE: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  
• 02/17/04 RE: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  

Rubens Kuhl Jr.

• 02/29/04 Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm
  
• 02/28/04 Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/19/04 Re: Verizon clients DOS own site?
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/06/04 Re: Are SW upgrades needed in MPLS core
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  

Ryburn, Justin

• 02/23/04 RE: possible L3 issues
  

Sam Stickland

• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/23/04 Re: BGP, MED, Confederation presentation
  
• 02/23/04 BGP, MED, Confederation presentation
  

Scott A Crosby

• 02/09/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  

Scott Call

• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/18/04 80/udp floods?
  
• 02/07/04 Lame Yahoo social engineering scam
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Latest IE patch breaking non usernam
  

Scott Francis

• 02/23/04 Level3 issues?
  
• 02/23/04 Re: possible L3 issues
  
• 02/04/04 Re: MS is vulnerable
  

Scott McGrath

• 02/23/04 Re: T1 Customer CPE Replacement?
  
• 02/17/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  

Scott Savage

• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Scott Weeks

• 02/12/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/11/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/11/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  

Sean Crandall

• 02/25/04 RE: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/23/04 RE: possible L3 issues
  
• 02/23/04 RE: T1 Customer CPE Replacement?
  

Sean Donelan

• 02/26/04 Expectations or It can't happen to me (w
  
• 02/24/04 Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 events
  
• 02/24/04 FCC rulemaking for mandatory outage repo
  
• 02/21/04 Re: M$ CD patches
  
• 02/21/04 RE: M$ CD patches
  
• 02/20/04 Re: Anycast and windows servers
  
• 02/20/04 Re: Identifying IP address types (fwd)
  
• 02/18/04 Anycast and windows servers
  
• 02/16/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Identifying IP address types
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Open, anonymous services and dealing wit
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Need some info on network management
  
• 02/10/04 Microsoft Messenger sign-on issues
  
• 02/09/04 Network and security experts (was Re: Du
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/08/04 Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/07/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/07/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/01/04 Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block access to
  
• 02/01/04 Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A r
  
• 02/01/04 www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A recor
  

sgorman1

• 02/26/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  

Simon Waters

• 02/09/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  

Stephane Bortzmeyer

• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  

Stephen Gill

• 02/08/04 RE: abusereporting (was Re: Monumentous
  

Stephen J. Wilcox

• 02/29/04 Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
  
• 02/27/04 Re: Best Common Practice - Listening to
  
• 02/27/04 RE: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/25/04 Re: Level 3 statement concerning 2/23 ev
  
• 02/23/04 Re: Genu/L3 Major Outage
  
• 02/23/04 Re: possible L3 issues
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/23/04 Re: BGP, MED, Confederation presentation
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/21/04 Re: routing invalid IP addresses
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Data center design ideas
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Data center design ideas
  
• 02/14/04 Re: BGP - weight
  
• 02/14/04 Re: BGP - weight
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Root^H^H^H^HGTLD Servers Request
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  
• 02/03/04 antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  
• 02/02/04 Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  
• 02/01/04 Re: updated root hints file (fwd)
  
• 02/01/04 Re: SCO blames ISPs for blocking access
  
• 02/01/04 Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A r
  

Stephen Milton

• 02/28/04 Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm
  

Stephen Perciballi

• 02/21/04 Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks
  

Stephen Sprunk

• 02/28/04 Re: How reliable does the Internet need
  
• 02/28/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  

Stephen Stuart

• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  

Steve Birnbaum

• 02/10/04 RE: Monumentous task of making a list of
  

Steve Francis

• 02/20/04 Re: Anycast and windows servers
  

Steve Gibbard

• 02/26/04 RE: How reliable does the Internet need
  
• 02/25/04 How relable does the Internet need to be
  

Steve Uurtamo

• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  

Steven Champeon

• 02/14/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP relaying policies for Commercia
  

Steven M. Bellovin

• 02/25/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Network and security experts (was Re
  
• 02/08/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/08/04 Re: abusereporting (was Re: Monumentous
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  

sthaug

• 02/07/04 Re: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a
  
• 02/05/04 Re: MTUs - Was: Strange public tracerout
  
• 02/04/04 Re: Poor connectivity to new b.root-serv
  
• 02/03/04 Poor connectivity to new b.root-servers.
  

Suresh Ramasubramanian

• 02/29/04 Re: First Post! Annoying Debate at Work.
  
• 02/18/04 Re: 80/udp floods?
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/10/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/10/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/10/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/09/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/09/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/08/04 Re: abusereporting
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/07/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/07/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/06/04 Re: greylisting
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/04/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  
• 02/04/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Latest IE patch breaking non usernam
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  
• 02/03/04 Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
  

Susan Harris

• 02/17/04 Meeting stats from Miami
  
• 02/09/04 IPSEC server at NANOG30 (fwd)
  

Sven Huster

• 02/18/04 standard transit arrangements
  
• 02/18/04 Re: BGP - weight
  
• 02/15/04 Re: BGP - weight
  
• 02/14/04 Re: BGP - weight
  
• 02/14/04 Re: BGP - weight
  
• 02/14/04 BGP - weight
  

Terry Baranski

• 02/08/04 RE: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/03/04 RE: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/03/04 RE: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

The Gunn

• 02/02/04 Re: AOL web troubles.. New AOL speedup s
  

Thomas Seyrat

• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  

Tim Thorpe

• 02/15/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/14/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/14/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/14/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/14/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/14/04 Anti-spam System Idea
  

Tim Wesemann

• 02/03/04 Re: [OT] Need Comcast Contact
  
• 02/03/04 [OT] Need Comcast Contact
  

Tim Wilde

• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  

Timothy Brown

• 02/24/04 Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/24/04 Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/09/04 OT - Special Interest Texas Reunion
  
• 02/08/04 NANOG30 - Bar connectivity?
  

Timothy R. McKee

• 02/16/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/16/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  

Todd Vierling

• 02/28/04 Re: Possibly yet another MS mail worm
  
• 02/27/04 Possibly yet another MS mail worm
  
• 02/18/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/11/04 Re: IPv6 reverse lookup - lame delegatio
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/02/04 Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello
  

Tom (UnitedLayer)

• 02/23/04 Re: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  
• 02/19/04 Re: Equinix 350 E. Cermak - Contact Plea
  
• 02/09/04 RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  

Tony Hain

• 02/18/04 RE: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 RE: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 RE: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 Clueless service restrictions (was RE: A
  
• 02/10/04 NTIA/DoC public comment period
  

Tracey Webb

• 02/11/04 Question
  

Vadim Antonov

• 02/02/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  
• 02/02/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  

Valdis.Kletnieks

• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/27/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/24/04 Re: 168.0.0.0/6
  
• 02/24/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/23/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/19/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/18/04 Re: Clueless service restrictions (was R
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Analogies=dead threads (was RE:Open,
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/15/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/14/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/13/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/12/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  
• 02/12/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  
• 02/12/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Root^H^H^H^HGTLD Servers Request
  
• 02/10/04 Re: Root Servers Request
  
• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Network and security experts (was Re
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/09/04 Re: question on ptr rr
  
• 02/08/04 Re: Dumb users spread viruses
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Lame Yahoo social engineering scam
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/05/04 Re: ISS X-Force Security Advisories on C
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  
• 02/02/04 Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello
  
• 02/02/04 Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello
  
• 02/01/04 Re: What happened to dot pro... (BTW)
  
• 02/01/04 Re: SCO
  
• 02/01/04 Re: Did Wanadoo, French ISP, block acces
  

Van Jacobson

• 02/11/04 animations from "Making Sense of BGP" ta
  

vijay gill

• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/26/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Converged Networks Threat (Was: Leve
  
• 02/03/04 Re: Unbelievable Spam.
  

Vincent Gillet - Opentransit

• 02/03/04 Re: Strange public traceroutes return pr
  

Vinny Abello

• 02/20/04 Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks
  
• 02/12/04 Re: Interesting BIND error
  

Vivien M.

• 02/07/04 RE: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  

W.D.McKinney

• 02/25/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need
  
• 02/25/04 Re: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/14/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/01/04 Re: www.sco.com no longer has an DNS A r
  

Warren Kumari

• 02/17/04 Re: Analogies=dead threads (was RE:Open,
  
• 02/05/04 MTUs - Was: Strange public traceroutes r
  

Wayne E. Bouchard

• 02/23/04 Re: L3 burp today - what happened?
  
• 02/18/04 Re: 80/udp floods?
  
• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Network and security experts (was Re
  

Wayne Gustavus (nanog)

• 02/20/04 RE: Verizon clients DOS own site?
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Monumentous task of making a list of
  
• 02/07/04 RE: Monumentous task of making a list of
  

Wesley Vaux

• 02/27/04 RE: How relable does the Internet need t
  
• 02/10/04 Williams Telecom
  

Will Orton

• 02/23/04 Re: possible L3 issues
  

Will Yardley

• 02/11/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  
• 02/10/04 Re: SMTP authentication for broadband pr
  

William Allen Simpson

• 02/10/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Stopping open proxies and open relay
  

William B. Norton

• 02/12/04 Peering BOF VII Meeting Minutes (NANOG 3
  
• 02/05/04 Peering BOF VII - Peering Personals is F
  

William Warren

• 02/20/04 Re: Verizon clients DOS own site?
  
• 02/19/04 Re: Verizon clients DOS own site?
  
• 02/09/04 P2P open source blocking project
  

william(at)elan.net

• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/26/04 Re: Lawsuit on ICANN (was: Re: A few wor
  
• 02/25/04 RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/25/04 RE: Proposal: De-boganising New Address
  
• 02/24/04 RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/24/04 RE: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/24/04 Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/24/04 Re: 168.0.0.0/6
  
• 02/24/04 Re: New Draft Document: De-boganising Ne
  
• 02/23/04 RE: Genu/L3 Major Outage
  
• 02/23/04 Re: BL of Compromised Hosts?
  
• 02/20/04 Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks
  
• 02/20/04 Re: eBGP, iBGP, injecting networks
  
• 02/20/04 Re: Verisign wins an award...
  
• 02/17/04 Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing
  
• 02/15/04 RE: Anti-spam System Idea
  
• 02/14/04 Re: Anti-spam System Idea
  

williamelan.net" <william@elan.net>

• 02/10/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/10/04 Re: A few words on VeriSign's sitefinder
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Where can I find a list of IPs and t
  
• 02/09/04 Re: [IP] VeriSign prepares to relaunch "
  
• 02/09/04 Re: Applying HD Ratio to all IPv4 alloca
  

First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

Previous month