Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi pleasecontact me ...)

  • From: Owen DeLong
  • Date: Mon Sep 29 13:12:27 2003


Micahel,
I think class action is a less effective approach here. Micr0$0ft has
vast resources ready to take on any large single lawsuit and make it a very
expensive and resource intensive process for their opposition. On the other
hand, with a low (around $25 last I looked) filing fee and virtually no other
real costs involved, and, and expidited calendar (usually around 2-6 months
from filing to hearing), the small claims process looks much more attractive
as a method for dealing with this.

Think about Micr0$0ft trying to fight off thousands or better millions
of small claims cases all over the country. Even if Micr0$0ft wins every
one, they lose.

Owen


--On Monday, September 29, 2003 5:48 PM +0100 Michael.Dillon@radianz.com wrote:


It reminds me of the Netgear and U of Wisconsin time server SNAFU.
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~plonka/netgear-sntp/

The difference is that Netgear admitted responsibility and worked with
UW to cope with the issue.  Further, Netgear has funded UW in it's
cleanup efforts and generally stepped up to the plate.  As much as I
don't
care for Netgear's products, they did show decent corporate
responsibility
when UW was able to escalate to the appropriate management at Netgear.
Sounds like a great example to put
before the judge when you sue Microsoft.
Can anyone say "class action"?

--Michael Dillon








Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.