Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: VeriSign SMTP reject server updated

  • From: Eric A. Hall
  • Date: Sat Sep 20 16:24:01 2003


on 9/20/2003 3:01 PM Sean Donelan wrote:

> Is it possible for the client resolver code to distinguish between a 
> wildcard answer and an explicit answer?  Or would the require another 
> flag passed between the client and a recursive name server?
> 
> If this was available, it would mail clients and other things
> interested in the specific domain name could get the answers they want.
> While other stuff would get the wildcard answers.

Internet architecture generally favors abstracting higher-layer data away
from lower-layer services. EG, we don't have ~BGP that routes :80 traffic
separate from :25 traffic, nor do we have a URI syntax that allows you to
refer to svc/tcp separate from svc/udp, nor do we have a naming service
that allows for service-specific address responses. Although any of these
could could be emulated, it wouldn't do anything for today's apps.

My feeling is that this architectural design feature is becoming more and
more of a restraint as complexity seeps in, the conflation of DNS error
codes being just one of many examples.

-- 
Eric A. Hall                                        http://www.ehsco.com/
Internet Core Protocols          http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/coreprot/





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.