North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Tier-1 without their own backbone?
- From: Christopher McCrory
- Date: Wed Aug 27 16:33:54 2003
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 12:32, Rick Ernst wrote:
> We are sending out feelers for adding an additional DS-3, or possibly frac
> OC-3. One of the responses came back with "we won't be competive with
> <provider> because they don't have their own backbone.
> Is there a cross-reference for provider vs network backbone, or is this just
> something that we have to ask each provider for? I "assume" that UU, Sprint,
> and AT&T are self-owned backbones, but others... ?
> One of the providers we are looking at is Level-3. Any comments good/bad on
I use Level-3 out of the LA Equinix facility. From a content provider
point of view, they rule. I have never had a problem with them, solid
as a rock.
> reliability and clue? We already have UU, Sprint, and AT&T. I also realize
> that the "they suck less" list changes continuously... :)
I hope more people respond to this part "for future reference".
"The guy that keeps the servers running"
Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
no defense. I tried it. Only tinfoil works.