CAIS (or whatever they're called today - BtNAccess/PCCW) is a small and
clueless player? Then why is 6461 peering with 3491?
In a message written on Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:15:18AM -0400, John Payne
If this is true, then why do the european NAP mailing lists (which push
IRR filtering) have an almost constant stream of "oops, our customer
announced everything to us and we leaked it".
Because European naps have more smaller and clueless players. I
know more than a few people (because they ask for peering) who have
an IRR entry that is 1 prefix for the "ISP", and 1 prefix for their
only BGP customer. It should be of no surprise they get that
customer configured wrong. It should also be of no surprise that
most of the real ISP's would never consider peering with those types