Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Extreme + Nachi = ipfdb overflow

  • From: Robert M. Enger
  • Date: Mon Aug 25 16:39:33 2003

I believe the old IBM "routers" used for the NSFnet
implemented fully distributed routing tables in each line card.
At that time, the commercial router vendors were still faulting
routes in to the line cards (or central accelerator cards)
on demand.

I think the good folks at Merit, Watson and ANS
were some of the early advocates of fully distributed tables,
due in part to their analysis of samples of real-world
backbone traffic.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard A Steenbergen" <>
To: <>
Cc: <>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: Extreme + Nachi = ipfdb overflow

> On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 03:38:52PM -0400, Joshua Coombs wrote:
> >
> > After battling Nachi and it's flood of icmp traffic, I've discovered
> > that it's not the Cisco gear that gets hit hard by it, it was the
> > Extreme gear.  Nachi generates enough 'random' traffic to flood and
> > subsequently thrash the ip forwarding DB on the Summit 1i we were using
> > so badly as to drop it from gigabit capible to barely eeking out
> > 6mb/sec.  Before I redeploy the switch, I need to find a way to keep the
> > ipfdb from flodding while allowing it to be the primary carrier of
> > traffic.  ACLs blocking ICMP on the Extreme act too late, by the time
> > the cpu sees the packet to drop it, it's already horned its way into the
> > ipfdb.  Does anyone have any suggestions on ways to allow the switch to
> > participate as an L3 router while minimizing the chances of a worm
> > taking it out so easily again?
> This affects most layer 3 switches, including Extreme, Foundry, and anyone
> else who still can't figure out how to pre-generated a FIB instead of a
> Fast Cache style system.
> It amazes me that people still have not learned this lesson. How old is
> CEF now? Then again, I suppose most of these boxes are being marketed to
> Enterprises anyways. As long as there is a label that says "60Gbps", the
> box looks good, and it's relatively cheap, how many of their customers are
> really going to notice the first packet performance of 6Mbps before they
> buy, right?
> At least some of the other vendors have workarounds (lame as they might be
> *coughnetaggcough*), or newer supervisors with FIBs, but I'm not aware of
> anything you can do to make an L3 Barney Switch behave well under a random
> dest flood.
> -- 
> Richard A Steenbergen <>
> GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)

Discussion Communities

About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home

Merit Network, Inc.