Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus

  • From: Temkin, David
  • Date: Wed Aug 13 12:19:37 2003

True, but at that time you didn't have illegitimate traffic on port 80,
either.  Future engineering could be worked around this issue.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Kaufman [mailto:matthew@eeph.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:09 PM
To: 'McBurnett, Jim'; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Port blocking last resort in fight against virus




> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On
> Behalf Of McBurnett, Jim
>...  I really can not image 
> legitimate traffic on 135..

My problem with this approach is that, in 1985, you could have said "I
really cannot imagine legitimate traffic on port 80".

(On the other hand, you could probably say that today and be mostly right)

Matthew Kaufman
matthew@eeph.com




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.