North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Mobile code security (was Re: rr style scanning of non-customers)
- From: Jack Bates
- Date: Mon Jun 16 18:26:08 2003
Paul Vixie wrote:
Is there a reason everyone leaves out poor lil' Mozilla which, while
having a few quirks now and then, far out-performs the M$ code. Let's
see. Better built in filtering (especially with imap), good thread
support, support for simple html to allow partial rendering without
setting off those spy tags, and the list goes on.
"text based" is not what i'd require. "professional grade" is the right term.
that can be anything from "xmh" to "eudora" as long as it was written to stand
up to the worst the internet is capable of delivering to it. "text based" is
my own preferred crutch but you don't need "text based" to get "professional
you sure as hell need to be able to look at them, and to know they're present.
bouncing them or stripping them are signs of extreme ignorance/irresponsibility
and the people who sell/buy/deploy/whatever the technology that strips or
bounces mime attachments "because of what they might contain" should get a
Ignorance is the commonality of the Internet.