North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: .mil domain
- From: Richard Irving
- Date: Fri May 30 14:49:38 2003
Precedent, Randy, Precedent !
UUnet and few others a long time ago had a differing definition of
"peering" that most of us thought, at the time...
But were so BIG, we accepted their routes, anyway.
* shrug *
A secret black list is a real bugger if:
No one is allowed to mention it exists.
If you get on it, there is now way off, no "right of redress".
No one can -tell- you you are on it.
No one can tell you if you -aren't-.....
And if you -somehow- figure out your on it,
they can't admit it,
or the -reason- you are on it,
or take you off even if they wanted.
Any and all of the above.
On a lighter note, the US Senate recently
unsealed the American McCarthy Hearing records.
:O :* :}
Randy Bush wrote:
In recent times, a lot of .mil have thrown up a whole bunch of null routes
to large sections of international address space. Good luck getting them
removed
as this means they have a different definition of the internet than
the one to which i, and i suspect others, are used, why should i and
others accept their routes?
randy
|
