North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (why not nanog-legal ?)
- From: McBurnett, Jim
- Date: Sun Mar 30 17:24:20 2003
I am not for or against either..
just putting thoughts out there..
NANOG-Legal would be a good thing for the legal eagles,
and a more consuming one for those of us already on numerous lists..
all in all, NANOG as a whole single list usually inspires more
information sharing when taken whole, IMHO....
Jim
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Devine, II [mailto:william@smartguys.net]
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 5:15 PM
> To: McBurnett, Jim; 'Jack Bates'; 'Rafi Sadowsky'
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True) (why
> not nanog-legal ?)
>
>
> Why not a nanog-legal list ?
>
> wiliam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
> McBurnett, Jim
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 01:47 PM
> To: Jack Bates; Rafi Sadowsky
> Cc: Jared Mauch; todd glassey; nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True)
>
>
>
> I agree...Partially
> Legal issues are important, but those below a
> management level, mostly don't care..
> I would not necessarily want another list to watch..
> But, it sometimes get's overly consuming to look at topics I care less
> about...
>
> anyway, that's my 10 cents worth.. Inflation ya know..
>
> Jim
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jack Bates [mailto:jbates@brightok.net]
> > Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 2:41 PM
> > To: Rafi Sadowsky
> > Cc: Jared Mauch; todd glassey; nanog@merit.edu
> > Subject: Re: NANOG Splinter List (Was: State Super-DMCA Too True)
> >
> >
> >
> > Rafi Sadowsky wrote:
> > >
> > > Whats wrong with the nanog-offtopic list ?
> > >
> >
> > The legal issues are technical on-topic and nanog related. However,
> > there are some that want to know what's going on in the
> legal system,
> > and others that don't. At the same time, those wanting to
> > keep track of
> > legal issues may not want to be subscribed to nanog-offtopic.
> >
> > -Jack
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
|
