Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: OpenSSL

  • From: Eric Rescorla
  • Date: Tue Mar 18 10:44:50 2003

alex@yuriev.com writes:

> > > This means that it is safer for senior managers in a company to 
> > > communicate using private ADSL Internet connections to their desktops 
> > > rather than using a corporate LAN.
> >
> > Afraid not. The timing attack is an attack on the SSL server. 
> > So as long as the SSL server is accessible at all, the attack
> > can be mounted. And once the private key is recovered, then
> > you no longer need LAN access.
> 
> While the timing attack is the attack against the SSL server, it is my
> reading of the paper that the attacks' success largely depends on ability to
> tightly control the time it takes to communicate with a service using SSL.
> Currently, such control is rather difficult to achive on links other than
> ethernet.
Quite so. What I meant here was that as long as Ethernet access
is provided to the server at all, having your own traffic sent
over a non-Ethernet link doesn't protect you.

-Ekr

-- 
[Eric Rescorla                                   ekr@rtfm.com]
                http://www.rtfm.com/




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.