North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Scaled Back Cybersecuruty
- From: batz
- Date: Tue Jan 14 18:31:55 2003
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
:That is the rub. Kind of like targeting treatment for AIDS to those
:with the most sexual partners - it helps solves the problem but is it
:worth rewarding irresponsible behaviour.
I don't think its fair or sensible to evaluate the outcome of a
distribution scheme by the kind of message it allegedly sends,
mostly because there is no mechanism within the scheme to satisfy
the evaluation criteria.
That is, the scheme has no way of deciding what is "responsible"
or not, so it shouldn't be evaluated on that basis.
It would be nice to raise-all-boats as the saying goes, but without
the basic state of the network being secure (thanks to vendor
default secure configurations), it's not going work.
:Is the government willing to provide enough incentive to change the
:market place? If RFP's alone can't do it what else could be tried?
Security considerations have to be built into every process. The RFP
process is a good start. Another would be the sales engagement
processes, design considerations etc.
It is an education issue.