Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: COM/NET informational message

  • From: bert hubert
  • Date: Fri Jan 03 14:27:46 2003

On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 07:15:43PM +0000, E.B. Dreger wrote:

> Yes, comparisons are case-insensitive.  So what?  strcasecmp()
> works on ASCII strings.  Now it must work on <new encoding x>.
> Why not let <new encoding x> be UTF-8, something programmers
> should support already?  Maybe MS-style Unicode encoding?  Why
> add yet another encoding?!

Even the current MS encoding does not work. Check out, which I
think runs VMS. It does not even pass >127 characters to the root-servers.
It is the nameserver for a /16.

dig www.abcț.com A @ <-\

> I fear I may be straying OT, for this is layers 6/7...

Hoping for all nameservers to magically break RFC compliance because you
think a 'properly coded nameserver' should behave is naive to say the least.

PowerDNS may well lowercase your query using functions not guaranteed to do
anything useful on >127 characters. Perhaps they are being helpful and
change capital-U-umlaut to lowercase-U-umlaut. Who knows.



--      Open source, database driven DNS Software           Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO                         Consulting

Discussion Communities

About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home

Merit Network, Inc.