Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Optical interface failure rates

  • From: Stephen Sprunk
  • Date: Mon Dec 23 11:04:31 2002

Thus spake "David Waitzman" <djw@bbn.com>
> Historically, optical interfaces have had lower reliability (MTBF) than
> electrical interfaces, of the same rate, due to a high burnout rate for
the
> lasers.  This has apparently changed now, and optical failure rates are
> lower.
>
> Do customers perceive this as true?

My experience is that product failure is almost exclusively due to design or
manufacturing problems, or customer damage (e.g. floods, ESD).

The best resource for this data would be your vendors' RMA departments.

> And in terms of all optical interface types, if you want roughly 10Gbps
> speed but are agnostic about how, what about OC192C POS interfaces
> versus 10Gig Ether?

In theory, both MTBF and price will be lower for the simpler technology, but
by the same token that simpler technology may not support all the features
you need.  It's hard to say what's best if you don't list your criteria.

S





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.