North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks?
- From: Jason Lixfeld
- Date: Tue Dec 10 20:57:25 2002
I like Segal's DoS idea, except instead of the packet generators, let's
be nice and just DDoS port 25 on the sunzofbiatches mail servers/load
fight fire with fire... :)
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 20:39, Scott Silzer wrote:
> That is exactly what was done to to Futureway a third party spammed
> for a site hosted by a downstream ISP and the result was there entire
> network begging blacklisted by SPEWS.
> At 15:41 -0800 12/10/2002, David Schwartz wrote:
> >On Tue, 10 Dec 2002 15:45:29 -0500, Scott Silzer wrote:
> >>I could understand if an ISP was allowing spam from a portion of
> >>there network. But in this case the only thing that the ISP did is
> >>host a website, the SPAM was sent from from a third party's network.
> >>The ISP did terminate the customer but in the meantime the entire
> >>NSP's network has been blacklisted, for a rouge webhosting account
> >>does sound a bit harsh.
> > A spam blocking service that worked that way would be
> >useless. Anyone could
> >get any site they didn't like blacklisted simply by spamvertising it. Anyone
> >who uses a spam blocking list that works that way is DoSing themselves.
> > DS
"AFAIK, You think I'm a BOFH for continually bashing you over the head
with a clue-by-four. OTOH, if you would just RTFM every once in a
while, my life would suck *much* less."