North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: FW: /8s and filtering
- From: Harsha Narayan
- Date: Tue Dec 10 15:05:49 2002
Yes, I just read that. But then APNIC's policy allows no such thing.
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Ejay Hire wrote:
> "This policy allows a downstream customer's multi-homing requirement to
> serve as justification for a /24 reassignment from their upstream ISP,
> regardless of host requirements"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Harsha Narayan [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 1:41 PM
> To: Alec H. Peterson
> Cc: Ejay Hire; email@example.com
> Subject: RE: FW: /8s and filtering
> The policy says that a /24 of PA space can be given if the
> customer can show that it has an immediate requirement of 25% of the
> /24 = /26.
> That is the reason I asked if the multihomer has to be able to fully
> utilize a /26=25% of /24 to be able to multihome.
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Alec H. Peterson wrote:
> > --On Tuesday, December 10, 2002 13:08 -0600 Ejay Hire
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Having a /24 doesn't indicate you are a network of any particular
> > > ARIN ratified a policy that allows multihoming as justification for
> > > /24.
> > I was thinking about PI space. ARIN did in fact ratify a policy
> > that a provider may allocate a customer a /24 of PA space if they are
> > multihomed.
> > Alec, red-faced AC member
> > --
> > Alec H. Peterson -- firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Chief Technology Officer
> > Catbird Networks, http://www.catbird.com