North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8...
- From: Randy Bush
- Date: Tue Dec 10 07:37:03 2002
> This gets to the heart of the matter. It is now 8 years later and RADB is
> not catching on. But during the same time period some other UMich people
> worked on a more general purpose directory service called LDAP and that
> one is catching on. LDAP technology can be made to do the job that we need
> done and instead of having to create tools from scratch we can leverage a
> lot of commercial tools to deal with the core functions.
you are confusing an application service, radb, with an underlying
store protocol, ldap. e.g., show me a routing db in ldap that has
10% the use of radb. by your reckoning, sql is the technology, as
ripe, apnic, and many others use it as the *store* for their routing
databases.
randy
|
