North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: what's that smell?
- From: Jason Lixfeld
- Date: Mon Oct 07 19:08:01 2002
And to that end, I wonder how many of the bad queries are coming from MS
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On
> Behalf Of Stephen J. Wilcox
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:05 PM
> To: Paul Vixie
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: what's that smell?
> to that end why doesnt bind ship with default zone files for
> rfc1918 space as
> well as 127.0.0.0 ?
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > since the last time we cleared the firewall statistics on
> > 1895GB of udp/53 input has led to 6687GB of udp/53 output,
> but, and this is
> > the important part now so pay attention, 185GB of input was
> dropped due to an
> > RFC1918 source address.
> > who needs DDOS when most network operators aren't filtering
> RFC1918 on output?
> > (there's only been 4.2GB of udp/2002 and other wormy
> traffic, by comparison.)
> > current winners of the "sustained input traffic over
> 100KBits/sec" award are
> > 220.127.116.11, 18.104.22.168, and 22.214.171.124. c-root
> keeps on ignoring
> > you, but you just never give up. congradulations, or something.
> > (note that c-root's network operator has offered to filter
> RFC1918 on
> > input from other AS's, but it's actually useful to keep on
> measuring it.)