North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: How do you stop outgoing spam?
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks
- Date: Tue Sep 10 12:43:19 2002
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 09:12:15 PDT, Joe St Sauver said:
> Actually, our experience *does* follow the backoff paradigm: if you block a
> particular source of spam, that rejection *does* seem to trigger "message
> volume" backoff at the source, with only periodic check probes apparently
> designed to see if the spam source is really still blocked (and of course
> it really still is).
Yes - but since they need to have N replies to their spam to make it worth
the effort, they will just pound on somebody ELSE. I saw one quote from
a very unapologetic spammer who was complaining that with all these blocks
he had to send a lot more spam and his costs were up 1000% as a result.
Let's say a spammer needs 100 replies to turn a profit, and 1% of the things
that make it into a mailbox get a reply. If nobody blocks spam, then the
spammer only needs to send 10K messages before he profits. If 99% of spam
is blocked, he has to send a million. That's why we're seeing statistics
like "receives 2 billion pieces of mail a day and 80% is spam".
Think of it like a host with multiple A records - if one A goes down, they
*do* stop trying that one, but they then fail to use backoff on the OTHER
Computer Systems Senior Engineer
Description: PGP signature