North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: classless delegation [Re: IP address fee??]
- From: Peter van Dijk
- Date: Mon Sep 09 07:46:27 2002
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:04:36PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > 184.108.40.206.in-addr.arpa. CNAME bla-reverse.example.org.
> > bla-reverse.example.org. PTR bla.example.org.
> > bla.example.org. A 10.0.1.60
> > What's wrong with that? No RFC against it ;)
> Are you sure about that? IIRC, the definitions of CNAME records
> and what they can point to are pretty strict.
If that is illegal, then so is RFC2317 :)
> > Cool, why does it work then? <grin>
> Just because something hasn't actually been made officially
> illegal doesn't mean that it's not a really bad idea.
It seems to me RFC2317 is pushing the edge of standards more than my
email@example.com | http://www.dataloss.nl/ | Undernet:#clue