North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: AT&T NYC
- From: alex
- Date: Thu Aug 29 17:49:28 2002
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:09:54PM -0400, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > > > Has anybody mentioned the benefits of ISIS as an IGP to them.
> > > Link-state protocols are evil, and when they break, they *really* break.
> > > I still do not see a compeling argument for not using BGP as your IGP.
> > Slow convergence.
> As well there is the issues of running a full iBGP mesh. I've actually
> been doing it, and now that I'm about to add my 5th router, OSPF is
> looking a lot better than configuring 4 more BGP sessions. I've heard
> some people recommend a route-reflector, but that would mean if the
> route-reflector goes down you're screwed.
Confederations are your friends.
route-map set-igp-community is your friend.