North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: AT&T NYC
- From: Robert A. Hayden
- Date: Thu Aug 29 15:58:46 2002
Yup. I like using OSPF to set up the mesh to the loopbacks and then ibgp
as the IGP.
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Michael Hallgren wrote:
> >Um. Set up more than one reflector....
> yes... and align your setup with your physical topology(so making it
> use other proto for mapping your infra, etc, etc,..
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 01:09:54PM -0400, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > > > > Has anybody mentioned the benefits of ISIS as an IGP to them.
> > > > Link-state protocols are evil, and when they break, they *really*
> > > > I still do not see a compeling argument for not using BGP as your IGP.
> > >
> > > Slow convergence.
> > As well there is the issues of running a full iBGP mesh. I've actually
> > been doing it, and now that I'm about o add my 5th router, OSPF is
> > looking a lot better than configuring 4 more BGP sessions. I've heard
> > some people recommend a route-reflector, but that would mean if the
> > route-reflector goes down you're screwed.
> > -Ralph