North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread,DIE!)
- From: Brad Knowles
- Date: Fri Aug 23 12:30:05 2002
At 9:17 AM -0400 2002/08/23, Jim Popovitch wrote:
Indeed, that was part of my point. They've already made a pretty
good choice for an MTA to handle mail for the list.
Interesting... mail.merit.edu seems to be running Postfix.
I doubt it. They've just got a big list, and they may not have
tuned the installation quite as much as they could have. Or, the
software and hardware may be as tuned as they can get, and they're
just out of capacity.
Did they dumb it
In any event, the point I've been trying to make (repeatedly) is
that, so far, all we have is a relatively small sample of data, and
we do not (yet) have enough information to be making any valid
Brad Knowles, <email@example.com>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)