Re: mail delivery time on nanog-l (was Re: Die thread,DIE!)

[Brad Knowles]

At 11:09 PM -0500 2002/08/21, Chris Adams wrote:

>  Well, on the thread in question, my response took 15 minutes to get back
>  to me (well, 15:06 to be precise).  That is by far the largest RTT for a
>  list that I've posted to lately (not counting lists with servers down,
>  etc.).
	See my previous message on this thread.  Without knowing more 
about how their network is run and what their current message 
delivery statistics are, all I'm seeing are a few complaints from a 
few people that they're seeing deliveries sometimes take 15-20 
minutes.

	This could very easily fit within an extremely reasonable 
delivery standard of 95% of all e-mail being delivered within five 
minutes, and 99% of all e-mail being delivered within one hour.


	I'm still not seeing a problem here.

--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)