North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs?
- From: Christopher L. Morrow
- Date: Wed Aug 21 23:14:17 2002
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Nigel Clarke wrote:
> Start now, do whatever it takes.
> Amongst the paperwork passed to congress, RIAA must have indicated where
> it's hackers would work from. Why not start there?
> NANOG should not sit on this.
> Trust me, if RIAA tried to function without email and internet access for a
> day or two I think they would get the message.
Surprisingly enough, they didn't seem to care too much that their website
was offline fora few days. You never can tell though.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 6:30 PM
> To: Nigel Clarke
> Cc: Jerry Eyers; firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Eat this RIAA (or, the war has begun?) - Why not all ISPs?
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 09:08:03PM -0700, Nigel Clarke wrote:
> > Why don't larger ISPs follow through on this? Simply deny RIAA any
> > access...
> And what IPs precisely are you planning to deny? So far its all idle
> threats, we have no idea where they plan to launch their scans or hacking
> attempts from, or even if they have any clue how to hack anything. I
> highly doubt they'll be attaching riaa.com to it either.
> I suppose if you want symbolism, you can host -l riaa.com and wack their
> wcom webserver and other stuff at att, but I'd harly call that
> Richard A Steenbergen <email@example.com> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
> PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)