Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes

  • From: Brad Knowles
  • Date: Tue Aug 06 19:23:17 2002

At 6:38 PM +0000 2002/08/06, E.B. Dreger wrote:

 So explain how this is superior to DNS entr(y|ies) stating who
 your peers and upstreams are.  And there's nothing to say that
 one could not specify allowed filters in DNS, too.
You don't want to do this with DNS. Trust me. There are far too many seriously screwed up nameservers out there -- including many TLD nameservers, and even some mildly mis-configured root nameservers.

Until such time as these issues get addressed (either DNS software gets more idiot-resistant, or we have DNSSEC and things like cache pollution are basically impossible), you want to find other ways to handle these sorts of things.

--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.