North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes
- From: Brad Knowles
- Date: Tue Aug 06 19:23:17 2002
At 6:38 PM +0000 2002/08/06, E.B. Dreger wrote:
So explain how this is superior to DNS entr(y|ies) stating who
your peers and upstreams are. And there's nothing to say that
one could not specify allowed filters in DNS, too.
You don't want to do this with DNS. Trust me. There are far too
many seriously screwed up nameservers out there -- including many TLD
nameservers, and even some mildly mis-configured root nameservers.
Until such time as these issues get addressed (either DNS
software gets more idiot-resistant, or we have DNSSEC and things like
cache pollution are basically impossible), you want to find other
ways to handle these sorts of things.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E W+++(--) N+ !w---
O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
|
