North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes
- From: Phil Rosenthal
- Date: Tue Aug 06 14:15:02 2002
I only have 10 /24's that are absolutely mission critical to keep up.
We have scaled back our IP usage, and we are a lot more efficient than
we were before about the IP space.
We are pretty well connected, so I would bet we would have a shorter AS
path than many other networks (particularly ones that would make a
mistake like that).
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com] On Behalf Of
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: Deaggregating for emergency purposes
PR> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:29:58 -0400
PR> From: Phil Rosenthal
PR> Most ISPs that build off of the IRR's do it nightly. I am talking
PR> about 10 /24's out of /19, and I'm not announcing any of the /24's
PR> -- and wont unless there is an emergency, and only then would it be
How did you arrive at 10x /24's? What about when someone else has a
shorter as-path, or it gets to "oldest route wins"? Polluting the IRRs
for little/no benefit is a bad thing.
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth,
consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
send mail to <email@example.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.