North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: istop arrogance
- From: Ralph Doncaster
- Date: Sat Jul 27 11:18:54 2002
> > > Because you could *gasp* be intelligent with your network design and do
> > > things like purchase transit from the same carriers in both your serving
> > > markets.
> >
> > I guess you don't consider redundancy to be intelligent. I do. I guess
> > you can call me stupid.
>
> Carriers is a plural word.. How does that not accomplish redundancy again?
As I pointed out in my last post, I can't. And even if I could the
economics of doing it don't make sense.
If economics don't matter, then the most intelligent network design would
be a redundant OC192 mesh, but I don't know even one network that does
that.
-Ralph
|
