North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: SPEWS?
- From: David Lesher
- Date: Thu Jun 20 11:16:26 2002
Unnamed Administration sources reported that Sabri Berisha said:
>
>
> > I'm curious; do folks take these guys serious?
>
> Any non-contactable blacklist should not be taken serious. Posting to a
> public forum (ie usenet) to contact the maintainer of such is list is not
> acceptable and I for one can not understand why any responsible site
> administrator would use such a list.
Has anyone here acknowledged why it is that SPEWS is like this?
MAPS was easy to reach, easy to find; they got sued into submission
time & again, by spammers with big money... SPEWS has yet to be
sued, AFAIK.
As as bonus, it's great fun to see a spamhaus show up and bleat
about how virginal they are, and they made one little mistake,
and it's fixed; can they PLEASE wear a white dress....?
And then the replies appear with records of spam after spam,
often still in progress, get posted in reply....
--
A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
|