North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.
- From: Daniska Tomas
- Date: Thu Jun 06 10:58:12 2002
let's suppose that usually provides the most appropriate environment for placing the dns servers and their co-infrastructure. taking it only technically, providing the connectivity for the ixp is a detail (to announce or not to announce). maybe the ixp could allocate a 'stub' subnet - separate from the transit subnet - and provide a voluntary mlpa to all the hosted isps. this would not break the isp policies on announcing the transit ixp subnet. all these are details.
i see a space for another topic in this thread - updating the dns infrastrucure a bit. to be more specific:
- would the ixp-located tld dns servers server only a small set of tld's each? if so, would it be region-based or agreement-based?
- would it be worth the effort starting a project similar to irr that would serve as a common source for dns configurations?
it'd be nice to hear your oppinions
Tronet Computer Networks
Plynarenska 5, 829 75 Bratislava, Slovakia
tel: +421 2 58224111, fax: +421 2 58224199
A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by blowing first.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnold Nipper [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: 6. júna 2002 16:29
> To: Daniska Tomas
> Cc: Nipper, Arnold; email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 04:13:08PM +0200, Daniska Tomas wrote:
> > how would you guarantee connectivity?
> as you have a lot of ISPs around you it should be really easy
> to get some
> connectivity. Very easy: tell some friendly ISP to announce
> your prefix/AS
> to outside.
> > should each isp present should provide bandwidth as part of
> collocation expenses?
> What do you mean by this? If some ISP want to donate bw,
> nice. If not also Ok.
> > should the opexes be included in the colo bill?
> Which colo bill?
> > and then - this would probably make the colo becoming a
> connectivity provider, wouldn't it?
> Not necessarily. This much depends on your IXP model. Let's
> take DE-CIX.
> There is an association running DE-CIX, but InterXion as colo
> partner takes
> cae for a lot of things. If DE-CIX would offer
> infrastructural services,
> InterXion still would remain a simple colo provider.
> Arnold Nipper Email:
> DE-CIX, The German Internet Exchange Mobile: +49 172 2650958